Cellulase Preparation Methods
Cellulases are enzymes produced mainly by bacteria, fungi and protozoans. Efficient and economical production of cellulases is a very important aspect as the cost of the cellulase enzymes is a significant component in the final cellulosic ethanol production cost in this route. A list of microorganisms producing cellulases are shown in Table 6.1. The most frequently reported source of cellulases is the fungus Trichoderma reesei, probably the most studied cellulolytic microorganism. Among the various microorganisms capable of synthesizing cellulase enzymes, T. reesei produces an extracellular, stable, and efficient cellulase enzyme system [17]. However, the
Microorganism |
Method |
Enzyme activities |
Reference |
||
FPase |
CMCase |
P-glucosidase |
|||
Trichoderma ressei |
SmF |
2.49 IU/ml |
7.15 IU/ml |
2.17 IU/ml |
[18] |
T. ressei RUT C 30 |
SmF |
6.2 U/ml |
54.2 U/ml |
0.39 U/ml |
[18] |
T. species A-001 |
SmF |
18 U/ml |
167 U/ml |
49 U/ml |
[19] |
T. ressei ZU 02 |
SmF |
0.25 IU/ml |
5.48 IU/ml |
ND |
[20] |
T. viridae |
SmF |
0.88 U/ml |
33.8 U/ml |
0.33 U/ml |
[21] |
Penicillium funicidosum |
SmF |
1.4 IU/ml |
4.55 IU/ml |
9.29 IU/ml |
[18] |
Acinetobacter anitratus |
SmF |
ND |
0.48 U/ml |
ND |
[22] |
Bacillus subtilis |
SmF |
2.8 IU/gds |
9.6 IU/gds |
ND |
[23] |
Bacillus pumilus |
SmF |
ND |
1.9 U/ml |
ND |
[24] |
Celhdomonas biazotea |
SmF |
7450 nkat/g |
13,933 nkat/g |
2850 nkat/g |
[25] |
Clostridium papyrosolvens |
SmF |
35 IU/ml |
45 IU/ml |
ND |
[26] |
Chaetomhim globosum |
SmF |
1.4 U/ml |
30.4 U/ml |
9.8 U/ml |
[27] |
Streptomyces drodowiczi |
SmF |
4.4 U/gds |
595 U/L |
ND |
[28] |
Thermomonospora sp |
SmF |
0.11 IU/ml |
23 IU/ml |
0.02 IU/ml |
[29] |
(Continued) |
Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose and Hemicellulose 225 |
Microorganism |
Method |
Enzyme activities |
Reference |
||
FPase |
CMCase |
P-glucosidase |
|||
Thermoascus auranticus |
SmF |
4.4 U/gds |
987U/gds |
48.8 U/gds |
[30] |
Neurospora crassa |
SmF |
1.33 U/ml |
19.7 U/ml |
0.58 U/ml |
[31] |
Thermotoga maritima |
SmF |
ND |
ND |
30 mU/ml |
[32] |
Penicillium funiculosum |
SmF |
1.4 IU/ml |
4.55 IU/ml |
9.29 IU/ml |
[18] |
Penicillium pinnophilum |
SmF |
2 U/ml |
65 U/ml |
10 U/ml |
[33] |
P. janthinellum |
SmF |
0.55 U/ml |
21.5 U/ml |
2.31 U/ml |
[21] |
P. decumbans |
SmF |
20.4 IU/g |
ND |
ND |
[34] |
P. occitanis |
SmF-Fed |
23 IU/ml |
21 IU/ml |
ND |
[35] |
A. fumigatus IMI246651 |
SmF |
40 EU/ml |
0.5 EU/ml |
1.73 EU/ml |
[36] |
A. terreus |
SmF |
243 U/g |
581 U/g |
128 U/g |
[37] |
Fusarium oxysporum |
SmF |
304 U/g |
ND |
0.140U/g |
[38] |
Table 6.1 (Cent.) |
226 Handbook of Cellulosic Ethanol |
low-glucosidase activity of the enzyme system from T. reesei leads to incomplete hydrolysis of cellobiose in the reaction mixture, and as a result inhibition of the enzymes. The most common method for the production of cellulases is submerged fermentation technology (SmF), which involves growing the microorganisms in a submerged culture.
Another alternative approach for the cellulase production is the solid state fermentation (SSF), where a solid substance is used for supporting the growth of cellulolytic microorganisms. Until recently the substrate used by many researchers for the cellulases production was pure forms of cellulose. However there are a number of recent attempts to utilize raw biomass forms and agricultural wastes as supports for the growth of fungi and bacteria that can produce cellulases. This includes: production of cellulases from Aspergillus niger NS-2 in solid-state fermentation on agricultural and kitchen waste residues [39]; utilization of eggshell waste in cellulase production by Neurospora crassa under wheat bran-based solid-state fermentation [40]; use of Jatropha curcas seed cake as substrate for production of xylanase and cellulase by Aspergillus niger FGSCA733 in solid-state fermentation [41]; okara for production of cellobiase-rich cellulases preparation by a selected Bacillus subtilis Pa5 [42]; palm fruit bunch fiber [43] as a support for the production of cellulase enzymes during the solid — state fermentation.
The most desired qualities of cellulases that used in the lignocel — lulosic biomass saccharification step in the ethanol production are highly specific activity, high rate of turnover with native cellulose/ biomass as substrate, thermostability, decreased susceptibility to enzyme inhibition by cellobiose and glucose, selective adsorption on cellulose, synergism among the different enzymes and ability to withstand shear forces [44]. There are attempts to achieve these characteristics through gene engineering approaches, over expression techniques and developing optimal enzyme cocktails and conditions for hydrolysis. Lignocellulosic biomass saccharification efficiency of a multienzyme complex depends both on properties of individual enzymes and their ratio in the multienzyme cocktail [45]. The ideal cellulase complex must be highly active on the selected biomass feedstock with minimum pretreatment, able to completely hydrolyze the biomass, operate well at mildly acidic pH, withstand process stress, and most importantly, be cost effective.